A 2004 study commissioned by environmental groups, but contested by the US EPA, concluded that coal burning costs 24,000 lives a year in the United States. All you show there is your hypothesis replacing others, and it may have very much merit but without careful measurement and real scientific justification you have nothing. The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) in 2016 estimated there was about 250,000 metric tonnes of solar panel waste in the world at the end of that year. I wrongly b…, ...........and accomplish their population control…, Jerry: And I pointed to the observed fact that onc…, So, this jab is actually designed to cause an auto…, Hi TL, You just wrote: "Of course, if a lamp is us…, Yes James I completely agree, we need constant exp…, I agree Linden, and I have said exactly the same a…, Yes, indeed we must share the facts, but a wise pe…, Right on, Linden. Toshiba Environmental Solutions told Nikkei Asian Review last year that. Perhaps you have the correct course, perhaps you are on the right road, without verified evidence you have nothing! Yet it is rather i…, Copernicus Meets the Greenhouse Effect (PDF), Absence Of A Measurable Greenhouse Effect, Greenhouse Effect Theory Within the UN IPCC, Why CO2 Has Nothing To Do With Temperature, The Planck Blackbody Equation and Atmospheric Radiative Transfer, Finite Element Model for Atmospheric IR-Absorption, One-way heat flow formulation with Planck absorption and re-emission, Alternative Theory To Man-Made CO2’s Influence On Climate, Keynesian Economics’ Relationship To Economic Prolems. The DTSC described building a database where solar panels and their toxicity could be tracked by their model numbers, but it’s not clear DTSC will do this. Industry often prefers to comply with a single national standard rather than multiple different state standards. Mr. Westgaard acknowledges the handling of CdTe panels in large solar farms may be closely monitored and recycling programs in place, but states REC is concerned with home solar power and medium scale solar installations that may not be subject to such controls. Dangers and hazards of toxins in photovoltaic modules appear particularly large in countries where there are no orderly waste management systems… Especially in less developed countries in the so-called global south, which are particularly predestined for the use of photovoltaics because of the high solar radiation, it seems highly problematic to use modules that contain pollutants. The information below comes from Wikipedia: the final sentence puts the two in context… “The theory behind the regulations is to make [disposal] less burdensome,” explained Rick Brausch of DTSC. The fact that cadmium can be washed out of solar modules by rainwater is increasingly a concern for local environmentalists like the Concerned Citizens of … Cadmium telluride solar cell, also called cadmium telluride photovoltaic or cadmium telluride thin film, a photovoltaic device that produces electricity from light by using a thin film of cadmium telluride (CdTe). From pv magazine International.. The funds would then, in the future, be dispensed to state and local governments to pay for the removal and recycling or long-term storage of solar panel waste. Adriana Ramos-Ruiz, Jean V. Wilkening, James A. “I’ve been working in solar since 1976 and that’s part of my guilt,” the veteran solar developer told Solar Power World last year. Such a recycling and waste management fund could help nations address their other e-waste problems while supporting the development of a new, high-tech industry in recycling solar panels. Lack of technical expertise can be a problem when solar developers like Sustainable Power Group, or sPower, incorrectly claim that the cadmium in its panels is not water soluble. If the industry responds with foresight, Mulvaney notes, it could end up sparking clean innovation including “developing PV modules without hazardous inputs and recycled rare metals.” And that’s something everyone can get powered up about. None of the above. According to a 2015 United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) report, somewhere between 60 and 90 percent of electronic waste is illegally traded and dumped in poor nations. Researchers at the department of civil engineering of the Indian Institute of Technology have reviewed around 300 studies concerned with carcinogenic waste in PV panels published between 2000 and 2018.. Low demand for scrap and the high cost of employing workers to disassemble the aluminum frames and other components will make it difficult to create a profitable business unless recycling companies can charge several times more than the target set by [Japan’s environment ministry]. Regarding coal-burning waste, it’s still a manageable waste that we handle. Poisoning from Cadmium Telluride can cause various reactions, from basic flu-like symptoms through to breathing problems, and kidney and liver complications. Given the decentralized nature of solar energy production, and lack of technical expertise at the local level, it is especially important that the whole society be involved in protecting itself from exposure to dangerous toxins. https://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16432. To me you guys are just as lost as all the meteorologists and climatologists are currently — and all of you are shouting loudly that you have the truth. With few environmental journalists willing to report on much of anything other than the good news about renewables, it’s been left to environmental scientists and solar industry leaders to raise the alarm. Alternate silicon-based solar panels have similar issues with lead leaching, although cadmium is suggested to be 10 times more hazardous than Lead. You don’t really understand the atmosphere and you don’t really care to understand it. Solar panel disposal in “regular landfills [is] not recommended in case modules break and toxic materials leach into the soil,” the Electric Power Research Institute determined in a 2016 study. Most solar panels have a glass front that protects the PV cell and an aluminum or steel frame. At the meeting, the representatives from industry and DTSC all acknowledged how difficult it would be to test to determine whether a solar panel being removed would be classified as hazardous waste or not. Back Radiation Greenhouse Effect of 33 Kelvin Possible? Dangers of putting that into a few hundred thousand panels, risks of leakage into ground water, and lack of disposal plans 30 or 40 years from now might, just… Sci. Chemical and Environmental Engineering; Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. James McGinn: “In the event of company bankruptcies, PV module producers would no longer contribute to the recycling cost of their products,” notes Milliman, “leaving governments to decide how to deal with cleanup.”. Most likely, he … They dare not sue, because to do…, Does this come as any surprise? “Green Prince of Darkness” at FauxScienceSlayer website. The debate over the toxic potential of thin film solar panels based on cadmium compounds has been reignited. Explain why should anyone believe your ideas? All the phoneys that came before were happy to provide you with the tools with which you could pretend to understand what you actually don’t understand. NO, none of you have, without those carefully made and verified measurements giving evidence that your theory is correct, and can be useful in predicting with good accuracy what the weather and climate will do in the future it is not that worthy. Principia Scientific International (PSI) is a not-for-profit community interest association. 57-64 ISSN: 0304-3894 Subject: “Washington-based solar panel manufacturer Itek Energy assisted with the bill’s writing,” noted Solar Power World. For large scale energy production, solar panels were a bad investment in the first place. Perhaps you have the correct course, perhaps you are on the right road, without verified evidence you have nothing! Explain why should anyone believe your ideas? “Approximately 90{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of most PV modules are made up of glass,” notes San Jose State environmental studies professor Dustin Mulvaney. The editorial board of the Wall Street Journal? Common problematic impurities in glass include plastics, lead, cadmium and antimony.”, Researchers with the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) undertook a study for U.S. solar-owning utilities to plan for end-of-life and concluded that solar panel “disposal in “regular landfills [is] not recommended in case modules break and toxic materials leach into the soil” and so “disposal is potentially a major issue.”. What propagandist rubbish. Governments of poor and developing nations are often not equipped to deal with an influx of toxic solar waste, experts say. Research shows that “leaching of trace metals from modules is unlikely to present a significant risk due to the sealed nature of the installed cells.” Some solar modules use cadmium telluride (CdTe). German researchers at the Stuttgart Institute for Photovoltaics warned that poor and developing nations are at higher risk of suffering the consequences. If so show it — AND STOP SHOUTING ABUSE! An Indian research team has analyzed around 300 scientific studies about PV panel waste containing carcinogenic metals. Vindicating decision: US Patent Trial and Appeal Board invalidates claims of Hanwha Q-Cells US Patent asserted against REC Group, Why renewable prices have become so cheap, Why solar-powered Christmas lights are a safer (and greener) option, How to keep cool without the air-con this summer.

cadmium leaching from solar panels 2021